I’ve been meaning to do a post about Star Trek: Discovery for about a year now. Originally it was going to be a “here’s what I hope” post, which then morphed into a “Oh man, this is gonna suck” post and now here I am writing a “Q be praised, it’s actually good!” post. It’s been a journey of twists and turns, is what I’m saying.
But yeah, having watched the first three episodes I can happily report that despite a year of negative hype, swirling rumours of backstage drama and basically the entire Star Trek fandom having written off the project as DOA, it’s not only surprisingly good, it’s probably the strongest opening of any Star Trek series since the original show. (Granted, that’s a low bar, Star Trek series are notorious for rocky starts).
I’m not going to do an episode by episode review, so here are just a few random thoughts about the show in no particular order. Mild Spoilers ahead but nothing too major.
The premise is cool but could create major problems further down the line
Discovery is set in 2256, ten years before the original series and around ninety years after Enterprise and shows the Federation getting dragged into a war with the Klingon Empire which will apparently be the backdrop for (at least) the first series. Cool. I can dig it. A series exploring one of the Lost Eras (the gaps between Enterprise and TOS and TOS and The Next Generation) will be pure Trekker catnip and, despite Gene Roddenberry’s pacifist vision, war stories have produced some of the very finest Trek so this is a good, solid concept. My only concern is that the series has set itself an absolute nightmare of a task continuity-wise. Not only does it have to keep faith with everything that’s happened previous to the events of the series in Enterprise, it has to ensure that it doesn’t contradict everything that happens afterwards in TOS, TNG, Deep Space Nine, Voyager and TEN feature length films (plus around five minutes of Star Trek 2009). That’s around 540 hours of continuity to keep on top of. It’d be a problem regardless, but positioning the series right in the middle of timeline makes it especially challenging as you have to keep looking in two direction at once, so to speak.
It’s very different, in a good way
From The Next Generation onwards new Star Trek series have started a very specific way; a two-parter where we meet our crew (particularly the captain who will be our main character), get introduced to the ship (or station), establish the premise of the show (boldy going, guarding the Bajoran wormhole, escaping the Delta Quadrant, whatever) and by the end of that two-parter the pieces are basically all set up and will stay that way more or less until the series ends. Discovery don’t play that way. For starters, our focus is not on the captain (who doesn’t appear until episode three) but on First Officer Michael Burnham, the first mutineer in Starfleet history, as she tries to pre-empt a Klingon attack, gets arrested and then recruited by the suspiciously shady Captain Lorca to join the crew of the USS Discovery. The series keeps a tight focus on Michael and ensures that we know as little about Discovery’s crew and true purpose as she does. This would be like if TNG spent three episodes showing us Picard’s final battle on the USS Stargazer. Instead of being in a rush to get the show’s status quo in place, Discovery is taking its time to tell Michael’s story. It also means that we the audience have no idea how each episode is going to end. That’s excellent. Rigid adherence to episodic formula hobbled Voyager and outright killed Enterprise and the franchise as a whole so a Star Trek that doesn’t feel the need to hit the reset button at the end of every episode is exactly what we need.
It looks smurges
Star Trek has never looked this beautiful. The production design, the CGI, the costumes, the sets. It’s all just so beautiful.
Love the new title, not sure about the music
Speaking of, the new opening titles are absolutely, jaw-droppingly gorgeous (but then Bryan Fuller produced this, so you were expecting what exactly?). My only quibble is the opening theme. It’s very pretty and atmospheric, but it kinda lacks its own identity. There’s snippets of the themes of The Original Series and The Next Generation but it feels like the composer set down to write an homage to Star Trek rather than craft a unique theme for this specific Star Trek show. Also, it lacks the crucial element of any Star Trek theme: Dadability.
What, you’ve never heard of dadability?
They’re memorable, is what I’m saying. The Discovery theme just kind of washes over me.
The cast is great
The cast is large and, at this point, it’s not entirely clear who is going to be a regular cast member and who’s just passing through but so far the casting director hasn’t put a foot wrong (except for one foot that I’ll get to). Doug Jones as scaredy-cat alien first officer Saru is a delight and Jason Isaacs is by turns charming and sinister as Captain Lorca. But by far the MVP is Sonequa Martin-Green as Michael Burnham. She’s got a really tricky line to walk, playing a human being with human emotions who was raised by Vulcans and has adopted many of their mannerisms and she nails it. Speaking of…
How I learned to stop worrying and love Spock’s never-before-mentioned adopted sister
So Spock has a secret semi-sibling that he never mentioned.
Michael being the adopted daughter of Sarek and Amanda caused a lot of controversy when it was announced, but so far, I gotta say, it’s working for me. It’s not like Michael is going around saying “HAVE I TOLD YOU ABOUT MY LITTLE FOSTER BROTHER SPOCK?”. But episode 3 ends with Michael recounting how Amanda used to read Alice in Wonderland to her and how, as the only two humans in the home, they shared a special bond. It’s a lovely little moment that deepens Michael as a character, but also adds a lovely little grace note to what we already knew of Amanda’s story.
As for the fact that Spock never mentioned her, well, why would he?
Oh, speaking of Spock’s family.
I’m not expecting anyone to be able to fill the shoes of the late, great Mark Lennard (and I’m actually very fond of Ben Cross’ portrayal in the JJ Abrams movies) but James Frain’s performance just isn’t working for me. He plays Sarek as sarcastic and condescending but with none of the dignity and immense sense of moral authority Lennard brought to the role. Swing and a miss.
Love Discovery, hate Discovery
Alright this is an incredibly nerdy nit-pick but Star Fleet ships do not have and never have had triangular secondary hulls that’s a Klingon design it shouldn’t look like that it’s wrong and I hate it I hate it I hate it…Oh, and speaking of poor design choices related to Klingons…
“Those are Klingons?”
Okay, so probably the biggest controversy prior to Discovery’s airing was the…interesting re-design of the Klingons. One of the rumours I’ve heard is that this had to be done because, while the creators of Discovery had the rights to make a Star Trek series they didn’t actually have the rights to the visual designs, hence the new ships, uniforms, and Klingons that look like they owe less to the teachings of Kahless than to those of Master Splinter.
Now, this is not the first time the Klingons have gotten a makeover. When they first debuted in TOS the creators decided to go with a “Brown People are Scary” theme and the Klingons were literally just white dudes in brown face.
When the time came for the Klingons to appear on the big screen, they were re-designed as Crab Faced Space Vikings (coincidentally, my favourite Saturday Morning cartoon show) and that’s the design that stuck. For a long time, everyone just agreed to pretend that no change had occurred, but when Deep Space 9 did an episode where the crew travel back to the Original Series era they actually have the crew meet the old, ridgeless Klingons and be all “What the hell”. It made for a fun gag, but now that it had been acknowledged it kinda had to be addressed. It fell to Enterprise to do a story arc explaining that genetic engineering gone awry had caused the Klingons to lose their ridges and so the whole business was more or less neatly tied up.
Aaand then Dicovery just shows up and blows all that to Gre’Thor.
My problem is not the new look Klingons per se. The Klingon Empire is usually depicted as being of comparable size to the Federation which means Klingons living on hundreds of worlds which means a staggering amount of genetic diversity and theoretically you could have bald, four-nostrilled, turtle-headed Klingons. So fine, they are Klingons, Doctor Bashir, and it is a long story. The problem is, we see Klingons from all across the empire in Discovery and we don’t see any classic Klingons, ridgeless or ridged which just doesn’t jive with later depictions.
But setting issues of continuity aside, this re-design just strikes me as a bad idea. It looks great when they’re standing still, no question. The costumes and makeup work are exceptional. But when you see the actors staggering around under half a ton of latex and armour you realise the problem. It looks near impossible to act in all this getup. There’s a reason the ridged Klingon designs put all those stale Cornish pastries on their foreheads but left the bottom half of their faces clear. Because that’s where the actors do their acting. Right now these Klingons will make good monsters, but good luck making them into characters.
I’ve made a conscious decision not to let the tech anachronisms get to me
Discovery features all kinds of technology that is a perfectly reasonable extrapolation of current tech trends and makes absolutely zero sense for a series set ten years prior to TOS.
Buuuuuut, Enterprise already completely shat the bed by introducing the crew to holodeck technology which would be like Abraham Lincoln writing the Emancipation Proclamation on his iPad so whatever, I’m just going to retcon Kirk and his crew as a travelling troupe of Space Amish who shunned advanced technology.
Anyway, Discovery is awesome, check it out if you haven’t already.
Live long and prosper.
Yours is the first review which made me go from “No way” to “Well, I guess I’ll have to give this a chance”.
I only hope I will not regret this!
Space Amish! I love it.
I must be the only person on earth who actually enjoyed the Enterprise intro. But then, I am not a Trekie. Still, whenever I watched one of the Enterprise shows, I always liked one thing about them: Their optimism about our future. That’s what I am missing in Discovery, and honestly, I currently could use some optimism. But now not even the Captains are trustworthy anymore.
Well it’s still too early to tell with Lorca. He might still be a good guy.
Maybe, but I am tired of all those morally ambiguous characters. I really need some optimism. Star Trek looks more and more like any generic Sci-Fi show instead of Star Trek.
That’s exactly why I dismissed it.
However, if Mouse recommends it… I guess I have no choice but to give it a try…
Man. I hope I don’t abuse that kind of power…
Mouse will next recommend “The Christmas Tree” for its beautiful animation and complex moral.
Well, I believe the official explanation for why Kirk and Co. were 1960s people flying around in the 23rd century was that the Federation government prodded its grumpy conservative throwbacks (by future standards) into joining the Fleet and then shipped them to the edges of known space with some folderol about seeking out strange new worlds. Thus leaving the rest of the Federation to have their orgies and transhumanism in peace. Maybe the starships of Kirk’s day were deliberately equipped with “retro-tech” so that the space conservatives would feel more comfortable?
In the novels the explanation was that during the Romulan Wars the Rs could hack Starfleet’s ships and take control of them so they had to make them as low tech as possible.
I’m gonna withhold my final judgement until the end of season 1. Even TNG needed that long to find its feet.
So far I’m enjoying it a lot, and just hoping that there will be an explanation for the continuity wonk somewhere down the line. They can make up something, it’s Star Trek, they pull magical explanations for things out of their asses more often than the wedgies caused by the Starfleet uniforms.
Like, I’m totally fine with how Enterprise explained the Klingons looking different. It wasn’t perfect, but it one set of writers trying to explain a retcon made by a different set of writers depicting a race made by a third set of writers forty years previously. It was never going to satisfy everyone, but it’s important they made the effort.
Overall though, good show, has the potential to be great.
Honestly it took TNG two series to find its feet.
DS9 is still the best!!!! Speaking of which… we know canon-wise that Dax was in their 3rd? 4th? host at this time, and that this host hooked up with Bones. So……. I doubt this would happen but I’d be super psyched if there was a Dax cameo. But y’know, that’s just me. 😀
Upon further research I have found that the Dax host at this time was Emony, a.k.a. the gymnast. She was the one who got all saucy with Dr. McCoy.
Beat me to it.
3rd host, Emony.
In all fairness to STAR TREK ENTERPRISE (for which I retain a fondness) it had a perfectly good piece of theme music, which was unfortunately confined to obscurity as part of the closing credits while something else was asked to establish the Grandeur and the Glory of Mankind taking its first strides into the Galactic Community – which for some reason involved a soft rock ballad.
^Don’t worry, that address above leads to Archer’s Theme (da da Da-DA daaa da da) and not the other one, with its apparently vomitous impact on your eardrum.^
“I’ve been meaning to do a post about Star Trek: Discovery for about a year now. Originally it was going to be a “here’s what I hope” post, which then morphed into a “Oh man, this is gonna suck” post and now here I am writing a “Q be praised, it’s actually good!” post. It’s been a journey of twists and turns, is what I’m saying.”
Kind of wish you would have written those things now. Speculation articles and how opinions change is fun to read about.
What do you want from me, I’m super lazy.
I’d suggest buying a cat as one possible cure for that, but then I thought of my Aunt’s pet moggie and was reminded that not all felines are fit to keep a mouse hopping – wait a minute, I might have spotted another flaw in that plan …
I’m withholding judgement for the time being, because I like some of the characters, but…it feels a bit too ‘grim dark’ for my tastes. I mean, I loved Battlestar, but the appeal of trek has always, for me, been in its fundamental optimism – that there’s no problem we can get ourselves into that we’re not smart enough to think our way out of.
The dedication to which, admittedly, tended to hamstring the writing from time to time, but still.
On the one hand, I HATE the new Klingons – everything about them, costumes, ships, decor – is massively over designed, and as you say, it makes life unnecessarily difficult for the actors (I’m not the kind of Trekkie who’s learned to speak Klingon, but the prosthetics seem to slow down their speech quite considerably).
It’s possible, I suppose, that I’m just nostalgic for TNG’s Klingons, who, whatever else, were never less than badass. (At the least those Klingons always seemed like they’d be good craic in the pub, unlike the current crop).
On the other hand, I am genuinely delighted to see a female main cast member with THIGHS, as I’m pretty sure that’s never happened before.
I don’t know about thighs, but I’ve rewatched the TOS mirror universe episode and can confirm that Uhura had abs like DAMN.